Out of all furniture needs, the chair might be the most imperative. While most other pieces (save the bed) are devised to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair was said here in the largest sense, from stool to throne to derivative forms like a bench or sofa, which may be regarded as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not simply a physical support or an aesthetic craft; it historically is symbolic of social placement. In the past royal courts there were clear connotations between being seated on a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but no arms, and having to use a stool. Since the 20th century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has developed iconic of superior position, and in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a high-set floor.
As a furniture creation, the chair can be employed for a wealth of different makes. There are chairs manufactured to suit man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to connotate his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). During the olden days there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Contemporary lifestyle has derived particular chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Each of these chair kinds has evolved to conform to different human needs. For its particular link with man, the chair lives to its full significance only when used. Whereas it doesn’t make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers whether there might be items inside or not, a chair is understood best and judged with a person sitting on it, for chair and sitter need the other. Thus the various parts of the chair were labeled like the names of a human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the simple function of a chair is to support the human body, its value is judged firstly from how suitably it fulfills this practical job. In the construction of the chair, the builder is limited by the static laws and principal measurements. Inside these regulations, however, the chair maker has large freedom.
The history of the chair was an era of several thousand years. There are societies that have created individual chair types, as expressive of the principal object in the arenas of skill and design. Among such peoples, a note can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the upshot of expert make, are now seen from findings made in tombs. First of them is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The iconic Egyptian chair would have four legs shaped similar to those of a designated animal, a curved seat, and with a sloping back supported over vertical stretchers. From this a durable triangular form was made. There appeared to be no significant change between the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical populace. The real variation exists in the kind of ornamentation, in the particulars of more valuable inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was manufactured as an easily stored seat for army officers. As a camp stool that type existed til much later points. But the stool also then existed in the task of a ceremonial seat, its technical role as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can from today be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were constructed in the shape of folding stools but can’t be folded because the seats are created of wood. The plain structure of the folding stool, composed of two frames that turn on metal bolts and bear a seat of leather or fabric fastened between them, was then seen somewhat later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better recognised of these is the folding stool, made from ashwood, which is now at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The unique Greek chair, the klismos, is known not as any ancient specimen still around but in a large amount of pictorial evidence. The best known is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location outside Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of those legs would be seen. These curving legs were thought to be manufactured of bent wood and were as such put under huge pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints holding the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore extremely solid and were particularly indicated.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek chair; a number of statues of seated Romans are designs of a denser and which appear to be a slightly less delicately constructed klismos. Both styles, the light and the heavy, were brought back during the Classicist time. The klismos influence is evidenced in French Empire styles, in English Regency, and in particular kinds of marked uniqueness within Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China is not able to be charted as long as the progression of the chair in Egypt and Greece. Since the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) a full serial of sketches and works of art was kept, with images of the interior and outer parts of Chinese homes and the kinds of furniture. Also kept of the 16th century are a number of chairs of wood or lacquered wood, that show an amazing similarity to styles of past chairs.
As in Egypt, there were two fundamental chair forms in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair has been constructed both with and without arms though never without the square seat and straight stiles (straight side supports) to give support to the back. In one style, it must be said, the stiles are slightly curved above the arms for the purpose of fit the angle of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of the chairback). All three limbs had been mortised in the yoke-like top rail. Though the style of the back splat then had an influence on English chairs during the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that could only to a particular extent embolden corner joints (and are loose to top that off) indicate a feature particular to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which closes over the rounded staves. Each member is round in section or has rounded edges—references as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is unpleasant to sit in and might have had a plaited seat. These chairs needed the sitter to remain stiff and upright; if too much weight is placed on the back, the chair has a habit of toppling over. In patriarchal Chinese households of this era armchairs likely were kept for elderly people, for they were held in great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have travelled to China from the West. It is not dissimilar that much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a dissimilarity in that the top rail is delicately held to the two legs of the stool by a curved member, which is more often than not provided with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the resulting effect of both these furniture forms is stylized. The structure and decorative parts are combined in a way that is all at once both naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is an upshot of the manner that the individual members do not seem to have been adjoined by either glue or screws, but are mortised with one another and fixed in position in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also had its signature on the chair. Artworks project a style of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a related board at the back could be folded after loosening some tiny iron hooks. In this way the chair was a portable piece of furniture in traveling which, during the same era, held the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered kind of chair can be seen in engravings of the inside of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this type of chair may also be seen in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not determined that the design actually began in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slender shape; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in considerable amounts, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a row of these chairs lined up against a wall. The form asserts itself by its elegant proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that was, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and has been imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The chair owes its popularity to a combination of relaxation and charm. The seat adheres to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are strongly constructed on craftsmanlike methodology even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them use wood of fairly thick dimensions; but each member is deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been removed, and more expensive items can be further embellished with very delicate and decorative woodwork. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry might be used for all of the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is in some cases used in place of upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more variable in style than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the premier circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and was popularised in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became well-known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office furniture in Sydney contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content